The DFW Project
Improving Student Success: Updates on the Challenge
The NHS Undergraduate Student Success Committee launched the DFW Project in Spring 2024 with an ambitious goal: to reduce D, F, and W (DFW) rates in undergraduate courses while narrowing performance gaps across multiple sections. In just the first year, we are already seeing meaningful progress.
- Fewer courses with high DFW rates. In 100–200 level classes, the average DFW rate fell from 15.9% in Fall 2021 to 13.0% in Fall 2024, with a similar trend continuing in Spring 2025 (12.8%). Upper-division (300–400 level) courses showed improvement too, declining from 6.9% in Fall 2023 to 4.5% in Fall 2024, with Spring 2025 holding steady at 4.5%.
- Substantial reductions in high-DFW courses. The percentage of courses with DFW rates above 20% was cut by more than half—from 21.9% in Fall 2023 to 10.5% in Fall 2024. Courses with DFW rates above 30% also decreased, from 5.9% to 3.7%. These improvements continued into Spring 2025.
- Greater consistency across course sections. In Fall 2023, nearly 70% of multi-section courses had a DFW variability greater than 5%. By Spring 2025, that number dropped to 44.7%, showing stronger alignment in student outcomes across sections.
- Improved retention. NHS first-time, full-time student retention for Fall 2024–Spring 2025 reached 90.8%, slightly above the UNC average of 90.5%.
While work remains to reach our 2026-2027 goal of keeping DFW rates below 20% in introductory courses, below 15% in advanced courses, and with less than 5% cross-section variability, these early results show that coordinated efforts—through workload initiatives, teaching innovations, mentoring, and shared resources—are making a difference.
We invite you to continue engaging with UGSS, STEM-IEC, and the MAST Institute in exploring strategies to sustain and expand these gains. Curious about what’s happening in your course? You can check out the in Power BI and the course equity disparities in the Equity Action Dashboards. You can also pull data for your course from (report ACD117).
Teaching Resources
We compiled a set of resources based on the work of the folks involved in the Teaching Academy for Instructors of Gateway Courses, a funded GART grant. In their work, participants identified the topics below for discussion. We have pulled most of the approaches and practices presented from HHMI-funded IETS program materials and from CETL
We encourage you to explore one or two of the topics with an eye to making a change or two in your course. None of the approaches requires a total course redesign but are rather tweaks that can have powerful impacts on your students.
Coordinating Multiple Sections of a Course
Aligning content and expectations across course sections is challenging, but essential for student success. The goal is for students to have the same experience and likelihood of success across all sections of a course. In some of our courses, there is currently significant variation across sections. Below are some starting points for discussion. You’ll notice the overarching theme is one of alignment.
Syllabus. Best practice is to have a single syllabus for all sections of the course. It does not necessarily need to read the same, but very similar information should be provided for all students.
Course Content. The content covered should be the same in all sections of the course, and the pace at which the content is covered needs to be aligned. If the content covered and/or pace are out of sync, it’s difficult for students to access help through tutoring or SI.
CANVAS. An easy way to have consistency in CANVAS shells is to use the UNC Templates and design the course in a development shell which is then applied to each section. More from IDD.
Course Outcomes. Departments should agree on appropriate course outcomes, especially when a course is part of a sequence. They should be consistent in all sections of the course.
Assessments. A few ideas about aligning assessments.
- The types of assignments (projects, homework, exams, etc.) need to be consistent across sections.
- The percentage of the grade allocated to each type of assignment should be the same.
- The expectations for each type of assignment need to be very similar.
-
- Instructors can align exams by applying Bloom’s to questions or using common exams/questions. Whether exams are open notes or closed book should also be consistent.
- For projects, agreeing on a rubric provides consistency across sections.
- For quizzes and homework, make sure grading norms are consistent across sections.
- Aligning the expectations is especially important where teaching assistants are the instructors of record. It’s a good idea to have a coordinator* check in across sections early in the semester to identify challenges with grading.
- Consistency with plus/minus grading
Policies. Policies such as late work, what happens if a student misses exams, whether attendance is required, etc. should be aligned across sections. The policies should be in writing, equitable, and flexible (as described above), and consistently applied.